Communities of practice as described by
Etienne Wegner “are groups of people who share a concern or a passion from
something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly”. It
is through things such as discussion, collaborative work, and interactive
activities that these communities develop an understanding. However, although a
community may come together because they all share a common point of interest,
it does not mean that they want to learn something while being in the
community. Communities of practice can be a place where people can just come
together to share their views for something. Thus, it is important to
understand what are the characteristics of a community of practice. Domain,
community, and practice are the three essential components. Domain refers to
the main interest for which the community needs to come together for. Community
refers to the relationships that are formed within the community that allow the
member to learn from one another. Lastly, practice refers to the development of
“shared repertoire of resources” . That is, by sharing experiences, stories,
tools, etc, with others, we can them use them in our own practice.
In my experience thus far I feel I have seen
communities of practice at work but have never given them that specific title.
For me they were just a community with a shared interest and didn’t think much
of it beyond that. However, after considering Lave and Wegner’s theory, I can
definitely see there is more than just getting together to talk about a common
interest. For instance, the relationships that are built in the communities
don’t just occur because you have a common interest; they occur because of the
level of engagement and discussions they have with one another.
In this class I believe the domain is our
interest for using technology as an academic resource and tool. I feel as if we
are all interested in knowing how to use online tools and electronic gadgets to
make learning more meaningful and engaging for students. Since technology seems
to be improving day-by-day, students interest in technology is increasing.
Thus, we need to know how to appropriately use it in our classroom. The community
in our class can be described as the students in our class but also the
faculty, cooperating teachers, and the people we follow who are also interested
in our domain. Although we may not interact with them constantly, we are
learning from one another. The practice component will then be when we apply
what we learn, see or hear from our other community members.
The source I found that disagreed with
communities of practice was Internet and
Higher education by C.M Johnson. In this article he argued that although
virtual communities are groups with a shred interest they are not a community
of practice. First because a “virtual community does not guarantee that a
community of practice will arise because an underlying task-based learning need
must exist”. Secondly, in order for members of the community to communicate and
collaborate, knowledge of technology may pose a challenge for some of the
members. Lastly, since this virtual community does not have ace to face contact
“cultural differences, superficial discussion content” and timely responding
pose a challenge to enhance community development.
I like that you state " relationships that are built in the communities don’t just occur because you have a common interest; they occur because of the level of engagement and discussions they have with one another." Productive and inspiring communities are built on the engagement level. People in them have to be interested in the topic and want to learn more
ReplyDelete